Search :  

Member log in

Register
 

| Home >> Forum >> B737-700 vs B737-800 LCC

Civil aviation forum

B737-700 vs B737-800 LCC

Return to the forum index - Post a message for this thread

  Message of Mrtnw - Sent 12 Feb 6:20  
 
Does anyone have an idea why the major LCC in Europe and the US use different models out of the 737 family? WN with the 737, FR with the 738?

The main difference seems to be the price and capacity.
You pay a few dollars more, but you can take over 25% more passengers on board with the 738.
The range of both types allow for flights across the European and North American continents.

The 700 might be more fuel efficient (the same amount of fuel gives you more range), but the extra seats of the 738 will generate extra income which will also pay of over the life of the plane...

Is it to generate higher load factors? Is it to lower cost per seat? Or is it that the 730 first entered into service 3 months later and WN couldn't wait for that?





User profil Private message Suggest deletion
  Message of Blitz - Sent 12 Feb 11:33  
 
Mind that many LCC's have both: TUIfly, Transavia, AirBerlin...

User profil Private message Suggest deletion
  Message of EI-DUB - Sent 12 Feb 14:29  
 
I think I also remember hearing that another reason that WN chose the -700 was that due to the lower number of passengers it allowed them have one less cabin crew on board versus the -800 which helps keep costs down i suppose!!!

User profil Private message Suggest deletion
  Message of Mrtnw - Sent 13 Feb 1:13  
 
Blitz, having a mix of both makes sense to me as you can differentiate per route, use the -700 for the thinner ones, the rest with -800. I can also imagine using 1 type simplifies the planning.

EI-DUB, would 1 less crew outweight 40 extra pax?

User profil Private message Suggest deletion
  Message of FLX - Sent 21 Feb 18:40  
 
Mrtnw:
1 less crew may not outweight 40 extra pax. But much lower landing+other airport fees due to lower aircraft weight and quicker turnaround(40 less pax to board/disembark) times may - key considerations for any successful LCC op. Also, if U're in a mkt environment(e.g. U.S.) where many of your competitors are also powerful LCCs, landing slots are limited(Even in 2ndary airports) and mkt is saturated, U want to hold on to/expand your frequencies(Keep same or even reduce capacity per flight) instead of decreasing frequencies(Increase capacity per flight) by upsizing equipment. For most parts of Europe, that's not really Ryanair's mkt environment as it nearly dominates the LCC arena(EasyJet is the only challenger I can think of with similar clout) and many 2ndary airports it serve are still quiet.

User profil Private message Suggest deletion
  Message of RJ1385 - Sent 08 Mar 16:43  
 
more pax = more weight = more fuel burn = more money

maybe the 700 is more economical for the number of people flying point to point. the non-lcc seem to like the 800 and 900s for running pax in and out of hubs.

User profil Private message Suggest deletion
  Message of ualtim - Sent 09 Mar 11:57  
 
There are many reasons to choose a -700 over a -800. As already mentioned, lower operating costs and fees due to a lower landing weight, but a big one may be pilot pay. Depending on the airline's contract with its pilots, the extra # of seats and/or the increased weight may boost the pilots into the next highest pay scale level. Unless your filling the extra seats on every flight to offset all the additional costs, it may not be worth it for the airline. Additonally, the -700 allows a LCC to be more flexible on its routes if it changes routes seasonally. You may have a high load factor in one season, but a lower one in another season so the lower costs/seats of the -700 may be more cost effective and the acquistion costs are lower eventually allowing that money to be spent on additional aircraft to run increased frequencies where needed.

User profil Private message Suggest deletion
  Message of - Sent 11 Mar 0:06  
 
JsMIwR <a href= http://odrzrzdbxqew.com/ >odrzrzdbxqew</a>;, [url=http://adgfluuwakal.com/]adgfluuwakal[/url], [link=http://apljdmezttub.com/]apljdmezttub[/link], http://pmmymilnzqme.com/

User profil Private message Suggest deletion
  Message of captain bill - Sent 11 Mar 9:45  
 
Lots of links above but I can't get a connection to any of them.

User profil Private message Suggest deletion

Post a message for this thread

   
 
To record a message, you must be logged in , if you are not yet a member Click here to register

Email :


Password :

Topic
B737-700 vs B737-800 LCC

Your message Insert a smiley



   

Messages must be written in english. Messages written in an another language will be deleted.
Post only messages related to the civil aviation, and do not insert any ad. Your IP is logged.
You can custom your text by using the following codes
[B]Your text[/B] : Text in bold
[I]Your text[/I] : Text in italic
[U]Your text[/U] : Text underline
[S]Your text[/S] : Text striketough

To include an Airfleets.net photo, use the code [P]Photo number[/P]



© Airfleets.net 2002-2008

[Contact] [Privacy Policy] [Disclaimer]
This is the content of Airfleets Dynamic Menu
Aircraft Airline Download Airport Forum Accident
Search an airplane
Supported aircarft
Production lists
Production summary
Updates
Search an airline
Browse airlines
Browse country
Fleet age
Download airfleets
World Fleet Listing
Fleet Listing
E-News Monthly
Civil Aircraft register
Airport database
Airport by country
Browse forum
New thread
Search the forum
Accidents database
Accidents by year
fatalities by year
Accidents by country
Fatalities by country
Accidents by airline
Fatalities by airline

[Tourism in Ibiza] [Santa Eurlaria - Santa Eulalia Des Riu information] [Tourism in Menorca] [Menorca island history]
[Planes information] [Plane-list Download aviation information]


AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com