|
   |
Inicio >> Foro >> bmi manchester aberdeen Foro sobre la aviación civil
bmi manchester aberdeen
Volver al index del foro - Enviar un mensaje en este tema
| |
Mensaje de amf - Enviado el 13 Oct 8:54 |
|
| |
can anyone comment on the experience of travelling in a embraer145, particularily the manchester to aberdeen service.
my job may take me there 3 times a month and was interested to know what a smaller plane experience is like ?
Thanks
|
|
Perfil del usuario
|
Mensaje privado
|
Sugerir supresión
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mensaje de whitehatter - Enviado el 13 Oct 9:45 |
|
| |
It's a fast and convenient flight, saves you hours over the alternatives. The Embraers are fine to fly on. Just like flying in a corporate jet but with more seats!
I like the BD 145 fleet, they are fast and comfortable and you really are not in the air long enough to benefit from a larger aircraft.
|
|
Perfil del usuario
|
Mensaje privado
|
Sugerir supresión
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mensaje de Fokker50 - Enviado el 13 Oct 18:40 |
|
| |
I have flown on them regularly on connecting flights in the USA. They take a small amount of getting used to on takeoff / landing as they tend to get thrown around like a turboprop (ATP, ATR, F50 etc) would, but they are doing jet speeds, thus increasing the sense of bring thrown around. I think I was unlucky that we got caught by a heavy cross wind on my first take off in this type!
Apart from that they are great, they get you there quicker than a prop. On the other hand, from a carbon footprint point of view, they are a disaster!
|
|
Perfil del usuario
|
Mensaje privado
|
Sugerir supresión
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mensaje de FLX - Enviado el 15 Oct 12:16 |
|
| |
RJs like EMB145 are great if your origins/destinations are not busy hubs. Speedy boarding/disembarking. Space per seat better than the typical A32X or 737NG.
However, if flying between congested hubs heavily populated by RJs like ORD<->JFK/LGA, prepare to spend a loooooong time in the cabin on the ground due to major congestions especially during peak hrs. Then again, other larger airliners suffer the same problem in those super-hubs. 'Fokker50' might be able to attest to that kinda experience in the U.S. I read fm Boeing that FAA estimated about 75% of all traffics in JFK/LGA are flown by RJs or something smaller.
|
|
Perfil del usuario
|
Mensaje privado
|
Sugerir supresión
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mensaje de FLX - Enviado el 15 Oct 12:21 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enviar un mensaje en este tema
|
|
Los mensajes deben ser escritos en Inglés . Los mensajes escritos en otro idioma serán borrados.
Enviar sólo los mensajes relacionados con la aviación civil, y no introduzca ningún anuncio. Your IP se guarda en el registro.
Usted puede costumbre su texto utilizando los siguientes códigos
[B] Tu texto [/B]: El texto en negrita
[I] Tu texto [/I]: El texto en cursiva
[U] Su texto [/U]: Texto subrayar
[S] Su texto [/S]: Texto striketough
Para incluir un Airfleets.net foto, usa el código [P] Foto número [/P] |
|